"ПРЕКРАСНОТО Е ВИНАГИ СТРАННО. НЕ ИСКАМ ДА КАЖА, ЧЕ ТАЗИ СТРАННОСТ Е ПОСТИГНАТА ПРЕДНАМЕРЕНО, ХЛАДНОКРЪВНО, ПОНЕЖЕ В ТОЗИ СЛУЧАЙ ТЯ БИ БИЛА ЧУДОВИЩНА, БИ ИЗЛЯЗЛА ИЗВЪН РЕЛСИТЕ НА ЖИВОТА. КАЗВАМ САМО, ЧЕ ПРЕКРАСНОТО ВИНАГИ СЪДЪРЖА МАЛКО ЧУДАТОСТ, НАИВНА, НЕВОЛНА, НЕСЪЗНАТЕЛНА ЧУДАТОСТ, И ЧЕ ИМЕННО ТАЗИ ЧУДАТОСТ ГО ПРАВИ ПРЕКРАСНО. ТЯ Е НЕГОВ БЕЛЕГ, НЕГОВА ОСОБЕНОСТ. ОБЪРНЕТЕ СЪЖДЕНИЕТО МИ И СЕ ОПИТАЙТЕ ДА СИ ПРЕДСТАВИТЕ БАНАЛНА КРАСОТА!"
Шарл Бодлер



IRS: We Made A Mistake Valuing Michael Jackson's Estate*


 14 870 views

The Internal Revenue Service says it made a mistake in valuing Michael Jackson’s estate.  Nope, the IRS hasn’t abandoned its  much discussed claim for  $702 millionin extra taxes and penalties—a bill Jackson’s estate is fighting in U.S. Tax Court.  Instead, the tax agency is upping its demand by $29 million to nearly $731 million.
In a previously unreported court filing, the government says that IRS auditors originally thought the King of Pop  owned only 50% of certain master recordings at his death in June 2009, when he really owned 100% of them.  That  100% interest was worth $91 million by the IRS’ figuring, compared to the $11 million reported on the Jackson estate tax return.
The change brings  the IRS’ valuation of Jackson’s estate and lifetime taxable gifts up to  $1.178 billion, compared to the $7 million the estate reported.  The IRS now wants a total of $525.6 million in tax and $205.1 million in gross valuation misstatement and negligence penalties. (Any interest owed will be on top of that.) Of course both the IRS and the estate’s values are best regarded as opening bids in what could be a long negotiation. A trial, if there is one, is far off.
Indeed, in a joint status report filed with the Tax Court  last month, lawyers for the government and the estate say that while they’re close to settling four relatively small issues and have dueling appraisers discussing the value of Jackson’s personal  tangible property, they  don’t expect a speedy resolution of the big dollar issues in the case. Those involve the value of Jackson’s intangible and intellectual property  (his name, likeness and his  interests in music he wrote or performed) as well as the value of two trusts he apparently set up to borrow against his assets and to transfer assets to his heirs at minimal tax cost during his life.
The two trusts hold Jackson’s music publishing rights as well as his 50% interest in a joint music publishing venture with Sony Corp.  Known as Sony/ATV Music Publishing,  the venture is the largest music publishing company in the world and owns or administers  millions of songs, including  Beatles songs Jackson bought back in the 1980s.  The estate placed the value of the assets transferred through the two trusts at just $2.2 million,  whereas the IRS says the taxable value was
$527.5 million.
Forbes senior editor Zack O’Malley Greenburg, who wrote a recent book on the Jackson business empire,   estimates the Jackson estate has earned more than $700 million since the singer’s death, as his music has had a resurgence,  with new releases, two Cirque du Soleil shows based on his work , the concert film This Is It and even an endorsement deal with PepsiCo PEP -0.67%.   But at the time of his death, the economy was in the dumps and  Jackson’s image was considerably less golden,  in part due to allegations of child molestation. It’s the value of his image at death that matters for estate taxes.
The estate valued Jackson’s name and likeness at a trifling $2,105, whereas the IRS contends they were worth $434 million.  Despite the unique circumstances surrounding Jackson, the resolution could well affect how other celebrity estates are taxed in the future.
The value of a celebrity’s image was also at issue in two recent U.S.  Tax Court  decisions involving  the income taxation of endorsement and appearance fees paid to professional golfers Sergio Garcia and Retief Goosen and is an issue in an ongoing Tax Court case involving best selling crime writer Karin Slaughter. Ironically, in those  cases, the IRS has tried to maximize Uncle Sam’s tax take by minimizing the value of such intellectual property, while taxpayers have argued (and Tax Judges have agreed) that  a celebrity’s image has substantial value.
Also on Forbes

Няма коментари:

Публикуване на коментар

Michael Jackson Official Group

  https://youtu.be/GGwWaVS7QPo?si=sxtEseTkSfGOKWHG Happy Birthday to Michael Jackson . Thank you for sharing your gift with the world and f...

Всичко за мен